Exposure, social vulnerability and recovery: IRDR ICoE on Vulnerability and Resilience Metrics publishes new research
11 July 2014

IRDR SC member Susan L. Cutter, together with colleagues from the University of South Carolina, Columbia/SC, USA, has published new research on “Exposure, Social Vulnerability and Recovery Disparities in New Jersey after Hurricane Sandy”. The Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (HVRI), Department of Geography, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA has recently been recognized as an IRDR International Centre of Excellence on Vulnerability and Resilience Metrics.

Cutter et al. write about Hurricane Sandy’s consequences for the New York metropolitan area and the observed wide variability in recovery efforts across the region, especially in New Jersey. “This paper examines the progression of recovery at two time intervals — 6 months and 1 year after the storm made landfall. Based on in situ observations of reconstruction and repair within the surge damage zone along New Jersey’s coast (N = 765 locations or points), we hypothesize that the timing and distribution of recovery is based on exposure (water depth, prior flood experience, building heights), vulnerability (social vulnerability, seasonal occupancy), and government support (FEMA assistance, Small Business Administration loans). Predictions of recovery (recovered, not recovered) based on these input measures is quite good at 6 months (80 percent correctly predicted) with slight improvements at 1 year (82 percent correctly predicted). The model is much better at predicting recovered points than recovering. In terms of the individual factors predicting recovery the level of exposure is the most significant, statewide. Within the two most affect counties — Monmouth and Ocean — only water depth and building height were significant predictors. Housing tenure (seasonal occupancy) was an important predictor of the location and timing of recovery for the first 6 months, especially in Monmouth County, but became insignificant thereafter. Government support in the form of FEMA individual assistance grants was a significant predictor statewide in both time periods. Clearly other factors are influencing the pace and location of recovery including confusion surrounding flood hazard zones and insurance. Those factors influencing the lack of recovery for the roughly 20 percent of our observations awaits further, more detailed analyses.”

See: Exposure, Social Vulnerability and Recovery Disparities in New Jersey after Hurricane Sandy

Related News & Events
25 August 2025
IRDR SC member Dr. Ronald Roopnarine contributed to several high-level panels on water conservation, food security, and sustainable agriculture.
20 August 2025
The virtual launch of the 2025 update to the UNDRR–ISC Hazard Information Profiles (HIPs) was held on 18 August 2025. The HIPs provide a comprehensive, science-based overview of 281 hazards, from floods and wildfires to pandemics and cyber threats, serving as an essential resource for disaster risk reduction worldwide.
15 August 2025
IRDR co-organised a special session on Resilient Heritage: Safeguarding ASEAN’s UNESCO Sites for a Sustainable Future, which reinforced IRDR's commitment to science-based solutions that protect both cultural heritage and urban resilience across ASEAN.
Disclaimer of use | Privacy Policy | Terms of use | Contact us|
Copyright 2023 Integrated Research on Disaster Risk. All rights reserved.
+86 10 8217 8917
Room B713, No.9 Dengzhuangnan Rd., Beijing China 100094